Clarence Cottam Award

The Clarence Cottam Award is the most prestigious student award given by the Texas Chapter of the Wildlife Society to recognize and promote student research excellence in wildlife biology, conservation, and management. Selected participants will have the opportunity to present their research to the entire membership. The winners are recognized for their outstanding research contributions, awarded a scholarship, and become part of the more than 30-year history of the Clarence Cottam Award.

The first place prize is a $1,000 scholarship sponsored by the Welder Wildlife Foundation. Second and third place prizes are smaller scholarships sponsored by the Texas Chapter and awarded if more than 6 papers are accepted. A maximum of eight papers will be included in the competition, with any additional submissions encouraged to present during regular concurrent sessions.

Students must be the senior author of the abstract and oral presentation. Research projects should be nearing completion so that results and their interpretations can be included. Only students that are affiliated with a Texas college or university at the time of research OR If affiliated with a non-Texas based college or university, students that have conducted their fieldwork in Texas, are eligible to compete. Students who have graduated since the last meeting are also eligible if they are currently members of the Texas Chapter of the Wildlife Society.

Cottam Award participants are required to submit two abstracts: one abbreviated abstract and one extended abstract. The deadline for submission of both abstracts is November 30, 2023. Submit Abstract

The abbreviated and extended abstracts should follow instructions outlined in the general call for abstract submission from the program committee. The extended abstract must be submitted online at the same time as the abbreviated abstract, be less than or equal to 3 pages, and in the style and format of the Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM). Abstracts should include a statement of objectives, brief description of methods used, concise presentation of results, and a summary of conclusions and inferences drawn. Do not include tables, appendices, or a literature cited section.

In addition to neatness and conformity to JWM style and format, abstracts are judged based on the following criteria:

  1. Significance and originality of ideas
  2. Creativity of research design and implementation
  3. Quality of methodology, including statistical analyses
  4. Validity of conclusions drawn from the results

Questions can be directed to the Cottam Awards chair.

Ready to enter the Cottam Awards Contest? Submit Abstract

Sample Abbreviated Abstract

Abbreviated Abstract Format

Abbreviated abstracts should be no longer than 250 words and follow The Journal of Wildlife Management format. Abstracts should be concise and include general problem statement, brief review of methods/experimental design, results, and management implications. For needed statistical significance statements, report P-values only (no need for exact statistical test results). Please follow formatting instructions on the abstract submission website.

 (please note not to use scientific names in title; use only in body of abstract; though not shown below, author list should use hanging indent)

Effect of Domestic Rabbit Urine on Trap Response in Cottontail Rabbits

JONATHON G. YOUNG, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA

SCOTT E. HENKE, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA

ABSTRACT Low capture rates of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) are common. We hypothesized that urine as an olfactory attractant would increase trapping success because rabbits scent-mark their territories with urine. We assessed trap response in cottontail rabbits using clean traps (control), traps baited with food, traps baited with block salt and minerals, and traps baited with urine from non-pregnant domestic rabbit does. We caught 314 cottontail rabbits during 2,000 trap-nights conducted from July-August 1996. We captured more cottontails in traps baited with rabbit urine (P<0.001) than in the others, suggesting that olfactory cues are important in the behavior of cottontail rabbits. Capture frequencies were 2.8, 13.4, 17.0, and 29.6% for control traps and traps baited with food, salt, and urine, respectively. Sex ratios of captured rabbits did not deviate from a 1:1 relationship for each bait or for all baits combined.

Sample Extended Abstract

Follow Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM) guidelines (please note not to use scientific names in title; use only in body of abstract).

Sample Extended Abstract (.docx file)

 

Comments are closed.